Anyone that took this tests believing they were legit is the first problem. I never took one and knew rhey were BS day 1. The guy that designed them said it was BS and then was dead a month later. It's a worldwide scam
WHO changed the definition of a case--from someone needing medical attention to someone testing positive i a test--so what do you need to produce a "pandemic" ?---a flawed use of a test to ensure everyone tests positive--enter Drosten
Nov 5Liked by Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly, Corinne Michels
This article verifies what 2 personal friends told me about the RT-PCR Test. One had run PCR tests for the State of Idaho Lab and the other was in charge of all Labs associated with the San Deigo Naval Hospital. Both said the tests were run at 45-47 cycles and at that many cycles virtually every test would be a false Positive! Also, the cycles run were never stated in the test results because it was a factor that very few Physicians would have understood anyway!
I attribute most of the lies of C-19 to Fauci. He should have known to educate physicians but I believe he was paid to lie, even if it was lying by silence.
1) No single test result can determine infection/infectiousness of any pathogen. Presence alone is insufficient to make that determination. The must also be replication. Which can only be determined by an additional test, preferably 5 hours or more later. More cycles = less pathogens present. Fewer cycles = more pathogens present. Staggered tests allow for high-confidence inference of replication or absence thereof. Several Nordic nations did this procedure, notably Iceland.
2) Testing must NOT be done in the same facility that vaccinations are offered. I.e. Walgreens, CVS, other pharmacies and medical facilities where cross-contamination is a notorious hazard, noted frequently as source for false positive test results.
3) Viruses have never been isolated, and cannot self-replicate. They are something akin to a lagging indicator of another biological event; a result, not a cause.
Nov 5Liked by Corinne Michels, Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly
That is what I was saying from the beginning is way fewer words, of course. Thank you for collecting the data a sharing it. I didn’t have the bandwidth to do the work you put in, so I really appreciate this.
"The COVID pandemic was really the Pandemic of Testing! It was used to lock Americans down, isolate us from friends and family, create rampant fear, and make us willing to vaccinate with an experimental vaccine." I agree that this statement is true. But I still don't know for sure what motivation they had to do this. Why did they want to force these vaccines on everyone? I don't think it was just a money issue, although there was a lot to be made. I am sure the reason is an evil one, but I haven't 100% figured it out yet.
What about power and social control? There needs to be public discourse of the motives. That's the only way to figure them out. I suggest a forum like X to be organized by RFK jr.
I stumbled on the following older link by accident. I have not seen any follow through.
I will copy it here in case someone who knows if it is information that more people should know about but has been buried. I will copy it to a few substacks that I read, please do not be angry, if it bothers you simply delete it.
Check out DailyClout.com. There are multiple reports on adverse events during the 90-day post marketing period after the Pfizer vaccine was released to the public. Also do some reading on Pfizer's Process 2 and Kevin McKernan. Pfizer's Cominarty was manufactured by Process 1 BUT Process 2 was used to manufacture the "vaccine" distributed to the world. The Process 2 product contained large amounts of DNA contamination from the plasmid used to manufacture Spike modRNA. It's an important story that has been silenced by pharma. DailyClout.com's Team 3 is going after the adverse events story and much much more.
Beyond a layman's comprehension and especially our Congressman in DC that just ignore the whole Covid con and go along to get along and stay in office. I acquired Covid and tested positive with a PCR test. Took 21 days to recover and went to Mayo for a test to confirm it was gone and tested negative. Co-incidence? Random events? Never had a RNA injection because of my medical background in drugs. In high risk group due to age, but my D level is 70 ng's. In spite of what is known, our beloved Biden administration has shipped millions of tests no charge to everyone. Need to keep the fear level high as we become lab rats to test more of the RNA injections that are being dreamed up by Big Pharma and the money people championed by the Pied Piper named Gates. What say you Senator Durbin , champion of Big Pharma and the FDA ? They sure don't want RFK Jr in charge of NIH! They will probably want to bring back a insider named Alex Azar that helped shepherd the whole Covid con.
I fell ill with the covid symptoms, before it was anounced, Jan 2020. I dutifully went along to get flu and bonus pneumonia as I had just become eligible due to age. Was sick 3 weeks, cough was most persistent symptom. Felt drained for many months after. No needles since and I've not been ill since then. I've often wondered about contents of those jabs.
I recently got into a heated discussion online with someone claiming to be a scientist and 30 year lab worker.
I put forward the argument of too many cycles being run and detecting anything and Mullis comments as such. They countered with the PCR test and Mullis comments being over 20 years old and no longer correct and the PCR test was not used during covid. They said the new gold standard was the rt-qPCR test which is totally different from the PCR and only worked at 45+ cycles and was totally accurate at detecting Covid infections. I did some research but any info backing up this claim was being put out by the US CDC which straight away made me suspicious.
Your friend is entirely wrong!!! In fact, she/he does not know what she/he is talking about. I have over 45 years of genetics research experience including 30+ years of molecular genetic tools. My students and I used PCR for over a decade. I also taught these techniques in doctoral courses. I sincerely doubt that your friend ever did any of these techniques and, if they did, they did them by rote without understanding what they were doing. Please read my Substack and you will understand how RT-PCR was used to scare people into being willing to inject themselves with an experimental drug that they called a "vaccine".
It does not matter when Mullis made his comments, what he said is as correct now as they were then. You cannot determine whether someone carries an INFECTIOUS viral particle using RT-PCR. RT-PCR is a 2 step process. Look at my Figure 1. Step 1 uses a Reverse Transcriptase reaction to make a single-stranded DNA copy from any SARS2 RNA in the nasal swab. Step 2 is the exact same PCR reaction as qPCR but is done in a devise that allows you to measure the amount of amplified DNA being produced. PCR works from cycle 1 to whatever cycle you choose to stop at. There is no minimum number of cycles except that the fewer the number of DNA copies you start with the greater the number of cycles needed to be able to detect amplified product.
Please read my article carefully. Show it to your friend and ask him/her to tell you exactly where it is incorrect.
Thanks for replying Corinne. Yes I have read most of your posts and understand most of the main points of the technical aspects of them. And well aware of the big picture and what they are trying to force onto us all.
This person was hardly a friend. Most likely a govt funded troll team who modus is crawling facebook looking for comments and pages to attack. I took the bait and got into an argument with them. I was holding my own until they brought this up (PCR and rt-qPCR being entirely different) as I had never heard this before. I don’t like losing an argument to untruths but I had no counter to that.
I doubt they would even read any rebuttals I sent now and notice they have deleted most of their replies from before. A good sign they are not legitimate. Plus most of the replies sounded like bad AI cut and paste jobs to me.
If you want to see the level of misinformation they are putting out look up ‘Scientist Goes Pop’ on facebook. They regularly get their followers to attack and call for banning of pages, comments and users on there.
Anyone that took this tests believing they were legit is the first problem. I never took one and knew rhey were BS day 1. The guy that designed them said it was BS and then was dead a month later. It's a worldwide scam
Lord give us all increased wisdom & strength with His Power!
Just listen to the inventor Dr Cary Mullis.
WHO changed the definition of a case--from someone needing medical attention to someone testing positive i a test--so what do you need to produce a "pandemic" ?---a flawed use of a test to ensure everyone tests positive--enter Drosten
Ah Drosten, the 'Demonic harsh rainier antichrist', an anagram of his full name.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/christian-drosten-german-virologist?utm_source=publication-search
This article verifies what 2 personal friends told me about the RT-PCR Test. One had run PCR tests for the State of Idaho Lab and the other was in charge of all Labs associated with the San Deigo Naval Hospital. Both said the tests were run at 45-47 cycles and at that many cycles virtually every test would be a false Positive! Also, the cycles run were never stated in the test results because it was a factor that very few Physicians would have understood anyway!
I attribute most of the lies of C-19 to Fauci. He should have known to educate physicians but I believe he was paid to lie, even if it was lying by silence.
1) No single test result can determine infection/infectiousness of any pathogen. Presence alone is insufficient to make that determination. The must also be replication. Which can only be determined by an additional test, preferably 5 hours or more later. More cycles = less pathogens present. Fewer cycles = more pathogens present. Staggered tests allow for high-confidence inference of replication or absence thereof. Several Nordic nations did this procedure, notably Iceland.
2) Testing must NOT be done in the same facility that vaccinations are offered. I.e. Walgreens, CVS, other pharmacies and medical facilities where cross-contamination is a notorious hazard, noted frequently as source for false positive test results.
3) Viruses have never been isolated, and cannot self-replicate. They are something akin to a lagging indicator of another biological event; a result, not a cause.
That is what I was saying from the beginning is way fewer words, of course. Thank you for collecting the data a sharing it. I didn’t have the bandwidth to do the work you put in, so I really appreciate this.
"The COVID pandemic was really the Pandemic of Testing! It was used to lock Americans down, isolate us from friends and family, create rampant fear, and make us willing to vaccinate with an experimental vaccine." I agree that this statement is true. But I still don't know for sure what motivation they had to do this. Why did they want to force these vaccines on everyone? I don't think it was just a money issue, although there was a lot to be made. I am sure the reason is an evil one, but I haven't 100% figured it out yet.
What about power and social control? There needs to be public discourse of the motives. That's the only way to figure them out. I suggest a forum like X to be organized by RFK jr.
Power and social control, yes. Money, murder, mayhem, and general chaos.
An IQ test as much as anything. You keep taking it until you pass or pass on!
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/the-great-covid-retest?utm_source=publication-search
The whole thing was a fraud, not just the PCR tests.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/05/03/pcr-and-rapid-lateral-flow-tests/
I stumbled on the following older link by accident. I have not seen any follow through.
I will copy it here in case someone who knows if it is information that more people should know about but has been buried. I will copy it to a few substacks that I read, please do not be angry, if it bothers you simply delete it.
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Suspected-adverse-reactions-to-COVID-19-vaccination-and-safety-of-SoHO-final-with-erratum.pdf
Check out DailyClout.com. There are multiple reports on adverse events during the 90-day post marketing period after the Pfizer vaccine was released to the public. Also do some reading on Pfizer's Process 2 and Kevin McKernan. Pfizer's Cominarty was manufactured by Process 1 BUT Process 2 was used to manufacture the "vaccine" distributed to the world. The Process 2 product contained large amounts of DNA contamination from the plasmid used to manufacture Spike modRNA. It's an important story that has been silenced by pharma. DailyClout.com's Team 3 is going after the adverse events story and much much more.
Beyond a layman's comprehension and especially our Congressman in DC that just ignore the whole Covid con and go along to get along and stay in office. I acquired Covid and tested positive with a PCR test. Took 21 days to recover and went to Mayo for a test to confirm it was gone and tested negative. Co-incidence? Random events? Never had a RNA injection because of my medical background in drugs. In high risk group due to age, but my D level is 70 ng's. In spite of what is known, our beloved Biden administration has shipped millions of tests no charge to everyone. Need to keep the fear level high as we become lab rats to test more of the RNA injections that are being dreamed up by Big Pharma and the money people championed by the Pied Piper named Gates. What say you Senator Durbin , champion of Big Pharma and the FDA ? They sure don't want RFK Jr in charge of NIH! They will probably want to bring back a insider named Alex Azar that helped shepherd the whole Covid con.
Did you get a Flu jab prior?
No! Not since 2020.
No ! 2007 had my last one when working in hospital! Got the flu. Never more! Beat it in 6 hours with Vit C, Aspirin and NAC!
I fell ill with the covid symptoms, before it was anounced, Jan 2020. I dutifully went along to get flu and bonus pneumonia as I had just become eligible due to age. Was sick 3 weeks, cough was most persistent symptom. Felt drained for many months after. No needles since and I've not been ill since then. I've often wondered about contents of those jabs.
Sick 3 weeks, help! At least it persuaded you off the needles.
I recently got into a heated discussion online with someone claiming to be a scientist and 30 year lab worker.
I put forward the argument of too many cycles being run and detecting anything and Mullis comments as such. They countered with the PCR test and Mullis comments being over 20 years old and no longer correct and the PCR test was not used during covid. They said the new gold standard was the rt-qPCR test which is totally different from the PCR and only worked at 45+ cycles and was totally accurate at detecting Covid infections. I did some research but any info backing up this claim was being put out by the US CDC which straight away made me suspicious.
Did this guy’s argument have any basis?
Your friend is entirely wrong!!! In fact, she/he does not know what she/he is talking about. I have over 45 years of genetics research experience including 30+ years of molecular genetic tools. My students and I used PCR for over a decade. I also taught these techniques in doctoral courses. I sincerely doubt that your friend ever did any of these techniques and, if they did, they did them by rote without understanding what they were doing. Please read my Substack and you will understand how RT-PCR was used to scare people into being willing to inject themselves with an experimental drug that they called a "vaccine".
It does not matter when Mullis made his comments, what he said is as correct now as they were then. You cannot determine whether someone carries an INFECTIOUS viral particle using RT-PCR. RT-PCR is a 2 step process. Look at my Figure 1. Step 1 uses a Reverse Transcriptase reaction to make a single-stranded DNA copy from any SARS2 RNA in the nasal swab. Step 2 is the exact same PCR reaction as qPCR but is done in a devise that allows you to measure the amount of amplified DNA being produced. PCR works from cycle 1 to whatever cycle you choose to stop at. There is no minimum number of cycles except that the fewer the number of DNA copies you start with the greater the number of cycles needed to be able to detect amplified product.
Please read my article carefully. Show it to your friend and ask him/her to tell you exactly where it is incorrect.
Thanks for replying Corinne. Yes I have read most of your posts and understand most of the main points of the technical aspects of them. And well aware of the big picture and what they are trying to force onto us all.
This person was hardly a friend. Most likely a govt funded troll team who modus is crawling facebook looking for comments and pages to attack. I took the bait and got into an argument with them. I was holding my own until they brought this up (PCR and rt-qPCR being entirely different) as I had never heard this before. I don’t like losing an argument to untruths but I had no counter to that.
I doubt they would even read any rebuttals I sent now and notice they have deleted most of their replies from before. A good sign they are not legitimate. Plus most of the replies sounded like bad AI cut and paste jobs to me.
If you want to see the level of misinformation they are putting out look up ‘Scientist Goes Pop’ on facebook. They regularly get their followers to attack and call for banning of pages, comments and users on there.