15 Comments
Dec 30, 2022Liked by Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly

It doesn’t raise NEW safety concerns because they were aware of the danger. They just didn’t tell anyone.

Expand full comment

Can someone please convince me I am crazy. I would much rather be crazy that correct in believing that we have not seen the worst yet. 2023 could be a very dark year.

Expand full comment

“That’s what happens when Amy doesn’t have bio right in front of me”…how embarrassing and awkward for Amy. Awkward and just wrong to make such an announcement.

Expand full comment

There were no COVID-19 vaccines close to approval on August 27, 2020. In fact, the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine trial phase 2/3 had only started a month earlier on July 27.The first contract, with General Dynamics, is dated August 27, 2020. It outlines a series of services the company was to provide to the CDC pursuant to the “anticipated increase” in VAERS reports due to the COVID-19 vaccines. It certainly appears that by August, 2020, the impending emergency use authorization of at least one COVID-19 vaccine was a foregone conclusion. BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin says that his mRNA vaccines rolled out in January this year (2021): Link here: https://www.ibtimes.sg/fact-check-biontech-ceo-ugur-sahin-refuses-take-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-due-safety-concerns-61652 but by August 27, 2020 – The first contract, with General Dynamics, is dated August 27, 2020 had been let and the contract states that they were expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports to be filed per day, with up to 40% of the reports being serious in nature and the CDC was already anticipating that the COVID vaccines might generate nearly seven times as many reports as all other vaccines combined (a 600% increase), The amounts paid out under the contracts with General Dynamics were redacted. But according to this site, the initial amount paid was $9.45 million, with $4.4 million added in late February, and then an additional $16.3 million tacked on in early March. In March of 2022 there was an additional $5.2 million added (increases in deaths and injuries beyond the intitial contracts) The Contracts 23 00099 General Dynamics Information Te..https://substack.com/redirect/dac78dc8-9d2d-4280-a390-218d47bb331d?j=eyJ1IjoibjFlaXcifQ.OkComRnvTz45cW2ospKdwvhGbhkMepFwvepUF91fYF023 00099 Eagle Health Analytics, Llhttps://substack.com/redirect/bcba05ff-1dce-4b15-a6a7-0f59f3cb115a j=eyJ1IjoibjFlaXcifQ.OkComRnvTz45cW2ospKdwvhGbhkMepFwvepUF91fYF0 Grand total? $35,425,642 The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) records 1% of all reports: Friday updated its numbers showing a staggering 1,481,226 reports of adverse events (x41 to arrive at December 2022 numbers) following COVID-19 vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 9, 2022. ...The above information posted by Josh Guetzkow – which I happened to come across.: 1,481,226 x 41 = 100% = 60,730,266 probable deliberate deaths and injuries in America alone, over the past 2 years - it does not include the countries which you live in or the genocide your governments have been inflicting on you and these were for immediate effects from the mRNA vaccines - waiting in the wings are the injuries and deaths to those, who did not have adverse effects at mRNA vaccination - their turn comes later on, but probably by 2025 - outlive 2025 and you will probably be safe for whatever happens next to your body.

BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin says that his mRNA vaccines rolled out in January this year (2021): Link here: https://www.ibtimes.sg/fact-check-biontech-ceo-ugur-sahin-refuses-take-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-due-safety-concerns-61652 but by August 27, 2020 – The first contract, with General Dynamics, is dated August 27, 2020 had been let and the contract states that they were expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports to be filed per day, with up to 40% of the reports being serious in nature and the CDC was already anticipating that the COVID vaccines might generate nearly seven times as many reports as all other vaccines combined (a 600% increase), with a rate of serious adverse events that could be up to 8 times higher, (bearing in mind that VAERS represents only 1% of all injuries and deaths recorded and multiplying the numbers given by 41 (x41) gives a much better appreciation of just how many American’s were being injured or had died, after vaccinations began in early 2021), on a daily basis: The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Friday updated its numbers showing a staggering 1,481,226 reports of adverse events (x41) following COVID-19 vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and Dec. 9, 2022, so for 100% x41 = 60,730,266 dead or injured Americans so far and it does not include the numbers your governments are inflicting on you, if you don't live in America.

With the current population of the United States of America was 335,813,917 as of Tuesday, December 27, 2022, based on Worldometer elaboration of the latest United Nations data.

Expand full comment

WAXING SCIENTIFICALLY

CNN Anchor Kasie Hunt & her Growing Tumor

Many dying suddenly do the "head search spin thingy" and appear to fight to not just wobble balance themselves but really spin circularly (heavy muscle involvement) ... wondering how many new blood clots and tumors are in the cerebellum area? Is the jab promoting hemangioblastomas. in the cerebellum?

What happens if you have a tumor in your cerebellum? If the tumor is in the cerebellum (the lower, back part of the brain that controls coordination), a person might have trouble walking; trouble with precise movements of hands, arms, feet, and legs; problems swallowing or synchronizing eye movements; and changes in speech rhythm

The toughest part of the surgery was locating the pea-sized tumor and extracting it without causing any damage to surrounding tissue. “We sent it to Pathology, and to our delight, it was a hemangioblastoma, which is a really good thing,” says Yoshor. “Once you take it out, you’re usually cured for life.”

Genetic testing revealed that the tumor was a sporadic, random occurrence, and wasn’t related to a genetic syndrome which can be associated with hemangioblastomas. The majority of people who get these tumors and do not have the genetic syndrome, like Hunt, never have another one.

Given the outcome effects of the mRNA jab on micro blood clotting might the body seek to foster alternate blood transport via a counterproductive vascular growth about a slowly degrading area of flow blocked tissue? EPIGENETIC switch? A counterproductive evolutionary capability expressed in time of trouble or need? Consider some evidence exists for the evolutionary pressure to conserve mRNA when proteins need to be manufactured frequently ... now spoon in some CRISPER to process gene segments and promote pea size slow growing cancers ... and BANG ticking-time-bomb stroke material ...

https://www.pennmedicine.org/news/news-blog/2022/march/cnn-anchor-kasie-hunt-brain-tumor-removed-at-penn-medicine

The Decision to Remove a Growing Brain Tumor

Yoshor, who developed an easy rapport with Hunt from the start, was concerned not only that the spot was growing, but “even more worrisome, the brain around it started to get increasingly angry and swollen, in a manner that could account for her headaches.” He hypothesized that the spot was a hemangioblastoma, “a highly vascular brain tumor that is typically benign, but can irritate or compress the adjacent brain and cause neurological symptoms.”

vascular tumor is a tumor of vascular origin; a soft tissue growth that can be either benign or malignant, formed from blood vessels or lymph vessels. Examples of vascular tumors include hemangiomas, lymphangiomas, hemangioendotheliomas, Kaposi's sarcomas, angiosarcomas, and hemangioblastomas.

Expand full comment

Justice please soon!!!

Expand full comment

So horrible that Pfizer would say that after knowing this.

Expand full comment

Amy, I'm wondering if you could clarify something. First question: My understanding is that the "90-day report" (post marketing report) that Pfizer was required to give to the FDA was submitted to the FDA on time -- sometime in the Spring of 2021. Is that correct? And that they did not hide anything from the FDA in that report, or at least it was mostly accurate and complete, even though the government hid it. Is that correct?

Second question: how did Pfizer collect this information -- e.g., 2 thousand deaths, big issues with heart disease in young people, and so forth. Was the collection of data a matter of a) following up on the trial participants, b) reports in med journals, c) reports into Pfizer, d) reports into CDC? In other words, was this a better of the Pfizer being responsible for collecting data from a variety of different sources?

Third question: if it is the case that Pfizer was acting as the party responsible for collecting the information, how can their honesty be verified?

My overall concern is about understanding the quality of the data that you have been exposing in the Pfizer documents. My concern is that for all we know, the vaccine could have been much worse than what you found, because Pfizer deliberately omitted data damaging to their interests.

Thank you for your great work, Amy. And thanks for reading this comment.

Expand full comment

Graphene Oxide in Moderna and Pfizer Covid/19 injections. Spectroscopic Analysis. Dr. Daniel Nagase

https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/graphene-oxide-in-moderna-and-pfizer

Raman Spectroscopic Analysis of Covid/19 Injections. Professor Pablo Campra. Almeria. Spain

https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/raman-spectroscopic-analysis-of-covid19

Graphene Oxide and Carbon Objects in Covid/19 injections. More Spectroscopic Analysis

https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/graphene-oxide-and-carbon-objects

More Spectroscopic Analysis, of Covid/19 injections, coming from Argentina: graphene, aluminium, silicium, iron, bromine...

https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/more-spectroscopic-analysis-of-covid19

Graphene, and other nanoparticles, in Covid/19 injections: 20 Analyses from laboratories, doctors, biologists... and journals

https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/graphene-and-other-nanoparticles

The Necro-Corona of “Molecular Spikes of Graphene Oxide”, and not the invisible coronavirus, induces a SMOG in the human organism

https://xochipelli.substack.com/p/the-necro-corona-of-molecular-spikes

Expand full comment

Behind the confidentiality clause's curtain, there is also the vast presence of graphene derivatives - and other nano-particles. This is THE issue - as the Spike only exists in the imagination of believers in mathematical virtual sequences - supposedly representing Sars-CoV-2 - stemming from computers.

Expand full comment