16 Comments

Isn't it interesting how Crimson Contagion, Event 201, and The SPARS Pandemic 2025–2028 all seem to predict the pandemic...

Expand full comment
RemovedAug 3
Comment removed
Expand full comment

how does eating compare with injecting I wonder...

Expand full comment
Aug 2Liked by Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly

Wow! This is the first article I’ve read about the origins of Covid that (1) is comprehensible by a lay person, and (2) is so well documented, so we can learn more AND finally understand what actual companies and people were involved in creating Covid. Thank you very much for this.❤️

Expand full comment
Aug 2Liked by Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly

A sobering, well written and foundational assessment. Let’s never, ever forget the CCP has full access to the Wuhan lab.

If that is not treason, I don’t know what is.

Thank you for publishing this important article. God bless you. God bless us all.

Expand full comment

You write "The SARS-CoV-2 virus that was spreading worldwide was isolated and sequenced, and the sequence compared to dozens of known coronaviruses. These results were used to construct an evolutionary tree and do sequence comparisons"

Who told you that the virus was ISOLATED and SEQUENCED. It was never taken out of a so called infected person and then Isolated & Sequenced. No proof to date has been given for that. Its just a computer generated sequence by chinese. Kary Mullis was killed for saying the same as his was the strongest voice. Luc Montaignier who jointly holds nobel for the virus identification later on acknowledged the same and had to run out of France to save his life.

Expand full comment

Brilliant work but I have to disagree with the phrase "lab leak".

It did not leak, it is not very contagious if at all so they had to spread it all over the place to give the illusion of a worldwide "pandemic".

It was therefore a very deliberate biological weapons attack and not a leak.

More details here; https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/lab-leak-zoonotic-spillover-or-deliberate

Expand full comment

Just ask Fauci! He knows what happened and who funded it!

Expand full comment

Utter nonsense

You are pushing pseudoscience the perpetrators need us to believe.

Pushing contagion, biological pathogens, viruses, viruses, transmission , gain of function at this stage is a deeply suspect position

Expand full comment

Corinne how would you address this controversy?

What Andrew Kaufman is arguing is that the current scientific consensus for the existence of Sars-Cov2 is based upon observational evidence and not stringent cause and effect evidence starting with the April 2020 Fan-Yu paper purporting to show the original Sars-Cov2 genomic sequence.

Which was allegedly taken from a lone patient with pneumonia from which a mish-mash of ingredients was taken and than appended too in a number of irrational ways which served as the original template for the rest of the world to piggy back off of.

And provided by the same trustworthy scientists of the CCP who claimed it came from a wet market and did not tell the world for months.

Expand full comment
author

All evidence is observational. I have never heard of "cause and effect evidence". I find your comment confusing. What do you mean a "mish-mash of ingredients". Do you mean that this individual was infected with several different viruses? Sequencing is always done in short runs of between 200-1000 bases. The short sequences overlap and are pieced together to get the whole. If this is what you are referring to, it is the usual process when sequencing unknown genes or viruses.

Expand full comment

Retrieve Steve Kirsch vs Andrew Kaufman debate. It would be most helpful to get your views on it. I attempted to summarize Kaufman’s argument poorly. But the schism needs to be addressed regarding viruses because there apparently many professionals on each side.

Expand full comment
author

Andrew Kaufman is a follower of the terrain theory that the "state of [a person's] internal environment, including factors such as nutrition, stress, and exposure to toxins, influences the body’s ability to resist or succumb to disease-causing pathogens." Unless I'm completely misunderstanding the concept of the terrain theory, Kaufman is not saying that SARS-CoV-2 virus does not exist. Culturing the pathogenic organism is not an issue now because of sequencing. SARS-CoV-2 was sequenced from thousands of infected individuals. As Kirsch said, the size of the SARS-CoV-2 genome was always the same. There was variation but that's because the sequence kept changing due to the accumulation of mutations. Using PCR to diagnose COVID-19 muddied the waters of the pandemic.

Expand full comment

Great article, but the word is “barbell,” not “barbel.”

Expand full comment
author

Thanks!

Expand full comment
author

Thanks but "barbell" is correct. A "barbel" is a carp-like fish.

Expand full comment

Sorry but NO, THAT is absolutely unscientific and NOT possible!!! Everything was an impertinent and highly criminal lie and fraud from the very beginning!!!

https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-0bf

https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-869

If you scroll all the way down here,

https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-6c4

you will see what was and is meant by the so-called "GoF"!

Expand full comment