Report 68: 34 Blood Vessel Inflammation, Vasculitis, AEs Occurred in First 90 Days After Pfizer mRNA “Vaccine” Rollout, Including One Fatality. Half Had Onset Within Three Days of Injection.
Women accounted for 81% of these adverse events. Why are women so much more negatively impacted across different System Organ Classes?
As originally published on DailyClout.
The War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project Post-Marketing Group (Team 1) – Barbara Gehrett, MD; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt – wrote an important review of vasculitis adverse events found in Pfizer document 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) Received Through 28-FEB-2021 (a.k.a., “5.3.6“). The search criterion for this System Organ Class was “Vasculitides.” Vasculitis, a.k.a., vasculitides, is inflammation of a blood vessel or multiple blood vessels. Small or large vessels may be involved, and symptom vary depending on organ involvement. The inflammation can be related to a direct immune attack on the cells of the blood vessel or to deposits of complexes of antibody and an antigen (virus or other protein) that is not part of the blood vessel itself.
It is important to note that the adverse events (AEs) in the 5.3.6 document were reported to Pfizer for only a 90-day period starting on December 1, 2020, the date of the United Kingdom’s public rollout of Pfizer’s COVID-19 experimental mRNA “vaccine” product.
Highlights of this report include:
34 vasculitis adverse events were reported among 32 cases (i.e., patients). One adverse event was fatal.
81% of vasculitis sufferers were women, and 19% were men.
Onset time from injection to symptom onset was <24 hours to 19 days, with half occurring within three days of receiving the vaccine.
Systemic vasculitis is difficult to treat. It often cannot be cured and can require permanently being on medication to manage it.
32% of vasculitis adverse events were related to skin rashes, including cutaneous vasculitis, vasculitic rash, hypersensitivity vasculitis, and palpable purpura.
35% of these adverse events were marked as “not resolved” at the end of the post-marketing period.
Pfizer received reports of three cases of Giant cell arteritis, a serious autoimmune disease of the large blood vessels that can lead to blindness if not quickly treated.
Three cases of peripheral ischemia, inflammation of blood vessels to the point of impairing blood flow, were reported.
Two instances of Behçet’s syndrome – a type of vasculitis with mouth, skin, and genital sores, often accompanied by eye inflammation and blood clots – were reported.
One instance of Takayasu’s arteritis, a very serious and rare disease where the aorta and its main branches are typically inflamed – was recorded.
Pfizer concluded, “This case review does not raise new safety issues. Surveillance will continue.”
Please read this important report below.
I am a physician .My wife developed myocarditis , with heart failure 5 weeks after injection of second Pfizer vaccine. We were reassured this was only Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, that it would pass and was related to some serious emotional or physical shock , despite the fact that no such shock occurred. One day after discharge after first hospitalization , her MRI showed myocardial edema consistent with myocarditis. Again ignored as being nothing. One week after discharge my wife suffered a cardiac arrest , and I resuscitated her in a hotel room . Again no one raised the issue of myocarditis , despite another episode of heart failure. We went from one high brow institution in NY to another , never given a straight answer. Recurrent episodes of heart failure , that go so bad I treated her at home with IV medications, to avoid hospitalization after 6 trips to the ER and admitted. Then later same year had a stroke, with partial loss of vision. Signs of autonomic neuropathy later the following year. STent placed in vertebral artery which thrombosed. No one raising the possiblity of vaccine side effect or offering solutions. The only ones that were helpful were the FLCCC who offered a protocol of treatment. When you have a government actively trying to avoid the truth, destroy the society for some god foresaken globalists. one must no longer trust that government . God help us all
In Australia, clearly leading the charge ‘against’ spread and serious illness (not!), the Health Sector is still mandating full ‘vaccination’ for staff and prospective staff.
Considering the vast and deeply disturbing evidence of death and serious adverse events, how on God’s green earth did we get to a place where employers are not only free and willing to place staff in a position of serious risk, but are permitted to MANDATE that risk? What ‘vaccine’ outcomes justify imposing potentially life threatening mandates?
I read their impressive Mission Statements and their Strategic Plans and I reflect on their professed values and I marvel at their care and concern for everyone in the community to enjoy health and wellbeing...then I think of the death and sickness and trauma and loss and grief and bereavement and I’m left feeling sick to my stomach...